|
Deliberation Theory >
Deliberative Theories of Public Discourse
Core Issues: nature of moral disagreement; public reason; civic virtues & deliberative capacities
| |
Liberal Theories
Much of the work done on democratic deliberation by contemporary liberal theorists involves demarcating a distinctly “political” realm, governed by public reason, which becomes the chief site of citizenship and the civic practices that accompany it. More
>
|
| |
Deliberative Virtue Theories
Whereas those theories advocating rule-based constraints on discourse tend to proceed by first effectuating a separation between spheres (e.g. public/private, public/nonpublic, political/nonpolitical, etc.), ensuring that the political realm will remain untainted by potentially disruptive or controversial More
>
|
| |
Hybrid Liberal/Virtue Theories
Recently, some theorists have begun to argue for models of public deliberation that
combine the defense of certain fundamental liberal values and governmental forms with an
advocacy for dispositional attitudes and principles (i.e., virtues) that are viewed as More
>
|
| |
Agonistic/Difference Theories of Discourse
Responding to perceived difficulties inherent in both rule- and virtue-based models of dialogue, “difference” theorists, or those advocating a more agonistic (i.e., conflictual) conception of dialogue, are inclined to defend a more robust and unconstrained view More
>
|
| |
Care Conceptions of Discourse
More
>
|
|